20% OF CITIES HAVE PASSED GREEN POLICIES
February 10, 2010 on 12:20 am | In Green Building, Green Cities, Solutions, Trends, U.S. Government, Uncategorized, all |20% OF CITIES HAVE PASSED GREEN POLICIES
Edited by Jodi Summers
Here’s a note of real estate optimism in dismal economic times - according to a recent survey by the American Institute of Architects (AIA), more than one in five U.S. cities with populations greater than 50,000 report having a policy to promote green buildings.
The AIA report, titled Green Building Policy in a Changing Economic Environment, is an inventory of legislation intended to help policymakers advance a more sustainable legislative agenda for growth and development.
The report contains detailed case studies of the green building programs in Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Boston, Nashville, and Grand Rapids, Mich.
“It is encouraging that cities are recognizing the economic benefits of energy-efficient buildings, and equally encouraging that the number of programs across the country are increasing despite such difficult economic conditions,” said AIA Executive Vice President / CEO, Christine McEntee. “Our ultimate goal is to achieve carbon neutrality in buildings by 2030 and that all design projects will be sustainable as a matter of course.”
Highlights from the report:
* 138 cities have green building programs, compared with 92 cities in 2007 – an increase of 50 percent
* 24 of the 25 most populated metropolitan regions in the United States are built around cities with a green building policy
* The Western region has the most green building programs with 56 cities in just six states
* The Mountain region is second in the percentage of cities with green building programs, with 24 percent of residents living in those cities
* The Eastern region has seen a 75 percent rise in green building programs since 2007
* The central region has 21 cities with green building programs
The report goes on to make recommendations McEntee added, “The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is helping to move sustainability efforts forward, with programs such as the Energy Efficient and Conservation Block Grant that are providing an unprecedented opportunity for the advancement of green building efforts nationwide. The inclusion of strong green building provisions in energy and climate legislation before Congress shows that our message about the importance of sustainable design is getting through.”
There are also a series of recommendations for steps a municipality could take to green their city. The AIA initially conducted this survey in 2007 for a Local Leaders in Sustainability report that has just been updated. It accounts for more than 53 million people.
**
http://www.aia.org/walkthewalk
http://www.mclib.org/colorentrance.jpg
http://www.aia.org/press/AIAB081674
http://urbandesignalliance.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/aia150_logo.jpg
http://www.archicentral.com/wp-content/images/lakeside.jpg
2 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment
Powered by Ground Zero
with WordPress



10 Clean Energy Stocks for 2010
A mini-portfolio of stocks that not only are green, but should outperform the market in an environment of increasing concern about climate change and peak oil.
This is the third annual list of green stocks I have published. In 2008, it was a list of ten speculative alternative energy companies (in three parts) that I thought might catch public notice that year. As we all now know, 2008 was a horrible year for speculative stocks, and my stocks were no exception, losing an average of 55% that year, although that still ended up being better than seven out of nine of the sector mutual funds and ETFs that I was then tracking.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/180084-10-clean-energy-stocks-for-2010
Comment by Tom Konrad — February 11, 2010 #
The Preservation Green Lab is partnering with the City of Seattle and the New Buildings Institute to pioneer a new energy code compliance framework (for both new and existing buildings) based on actual post-construction performance outcomes. With outcome-based codes, building owners will have the flexibility to pursue whatever retrofit strategies they deem appropriate for their individual buildings, but in return are required to achieve a pre-negotiated performance target on an ongoing basis.
The ultimate goal of an outcome-based code framework is full accountability for energy performance of all buildings, with complete flexibility in how to achieve it. What works in Seattle will work in other places – and the
goal is to replicate this innovative model code throughout the country.
Comment by Patrice Frey — May 20, 2010 #